Good morning, Principal — here's the staffing picture for next year.
Live read of 26-27A sheet · loading…
Real data in this demo: teacher names, weekly loads, sections and subjects — all parsed from the
school's own planning workbook. Stubbed for demo: attendance, "at-risk students", parent engagement
(those need the inputs listed in module_inputs.md).
Faculty
—
teachers planned
Filled roles—
Vacancies (NEW *)—
Sections
—
across KG → G12
HS (G9–G12)—
MS (G6–G8)—
Load utilisation
—
school-wide
Over-cap teachers—
Under-utilised—
Subject coverage
—
gaps to resolve
Total periods/wk—
Subject codes—
Teacher load distribution
Weekly periods · assigned vs cap · top variance
—
AI suggestion (preview):
rebalance —'s overflow into —'s slack
would bring all teachers within ±10% of mean.
Simulate →
Load status · summary
How balanced is the AY 2026/27 plan
Top over-capacity
Most slack available
Section × subject coverage
Weekly periods scheduled per section · darker = more
—
Not scheduled
1–2/wk
3–4/wk
5–6/wk
7+/wk
Gap (subject required, none scheduled)
M
Ask Manhaj anything — e.g. "who can take 2 more Math periods at G10?" or "why is G9 short of Physics?"